2008考研英语毕金献冲刺试题解析(试卷三)

来源: 作者: 时间:2007-12-23 点击:

2008年研究生入学统一考试英语模拟试题汇总

 全国硕士研究生入学考试英语冲刺试题Simulated Entrance Test of English for MA/MS Candidates Model Test 8
  毕金献命制
  版权所有侵权必究
  考生注意事项
  - 考生必须严格遵守各项考场规则。
  - 答题前,考生应按准考证上的有关内容填写答题卡上的“考生姓名”、“报考单位”、“考生编号”等信息。
  - 答案必须按要求填涂或写在指定的答题卡上。
  ★英语知识运用、阅读理解A节、B节的答案填涂在答题卡1上。填涂部分应该按照答题卡上的要求用2B铅笔完成。如要改动,必须用橡皮擦干净。
  ★阅读理解C节的答案和作文必须用(蓝)黑色字迹钢笔、圆珠笔或签字笔在答题卡2上作答。字迹要清楚。
  - 考试结束后,将答题卡1、答题卡2一并装入原试卷袋中,试题交给监考人员。
  做 题 提 醒
  - 本试卷严格按照最新考纲的要求编写,针对性、权威性强,信度高,是备考训练的精品。
  - 建议以临战状态进行自测,结束后仔细核对答案,自己评分并找出薄弱环节,在以后的复习中重点突破。
  考试时间180分钟满分100分得分英语冲刺试题8第页
    Section ⅠUse of English
  Directions:
  Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A,B,C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
  Due to recent national events, the Yardley City Government has introduced new bomb threat procedures for government buildings. This information is 1 department use only.
  From this 2 on, all personnel must be on the highest 3. You must pay close attention to your surroundings. If a vehicle you do not 4 enters the parking lot, observe driver and passenger behavior. If an employee has been 5 recently, examine his or her performance evaluations and exit 6 reports. If there are incidents involving visitors, 7 your supervisor. Keep in mind, however, that we must not 8. Part of being alert is exercising proper 9.
  If there is an actual bomb threat, 10 the following procedures: First, remove all the peopel from the building. Do not fall 11 fire drill routines, remember you are doing so in order to avoid injury 12 from planned violence. Leave the building immediately, and take nothing with you. Do not 13 electric equipment. Keep movement 14 a minimum. If there are visitors and/or persons 15 special needs in the building, make certain that they are removed.
  Proceed to the area away from the building 16 in the fire drill policy. Do not enter vehicles parked nearby. Take attendance, and make mental notes about any 17 personnel or any questionable activity in or near the building. If you received the actual threat, 18 as much information as possible: gender, specific language, “insider” information, type of violence threatened. 19 you reach your safe area, inform emergency personnel and 20 the information with them.
  1. [A] to [B] for [C] in [D] of
  2. [A] period [B] instance [C] point [D] event
  3. [A] readiness [B] defence [C] guard [D] alert
  4. [A] recognize [B] distinguish [C] discern [D] perceive
  5. [A] terminated [B] questioned [C] suspected [D] transferred
  6. [A] inquiry [B] inspection [C] instruction [D] interview
  7. [A] signify [B] notify [C] verify [D] testify
  8. [A] overrate [B] oversight [C] overreact [D] overbear
  9. [A] function [B] judgment [C] influence [D] authority
  10. [A] cling to [B] clutch at [C] abide by [D] carry out
  11. [A] for [B] in [C] into [D] off
  12. [A] stemming [B] emerging [C] deviating [D] suffering
  13. [A] shut down [B] switch on[ C] turn up [D] break off
  14. [A] at [B] to [C] on [D] in
  15. [A] in [B] for [C] with [D] within
  16. [A] regulated [B] confined [C] designed [D] designated
  17. [A] remaining [B] dispersing [C] losing [D] missing
  18. [A] record [B] offer [C] store [D] supply
  19. [A] Until [B] Unless [C] Once [D] Since
  20. [A] deliver [B] share [C] analyze [D] evaluate
Section ⅡReading Comprehension
  Part A
  Directions:
  Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A,B,C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)
  Text1
  Recently, the right of public personalities to direct and profit from all commercial exploitations of their fame has gained widespread acceptance. Recognition of this “right of publicity,” however, has raised difficult questions concerning the proper scope and duration of the right as well as its relationship to free speech and free trade interests. Often, the “type” of personality, be it an entertainer, politician, or athlete, also weighs on this decision-making process.
  The right of publicity protects economic interests of celebrities in their own fame by allowing them to control and profit from the publicity values which they have created. Before courts recognized this right, celebrities’ primary protection against the unauthorized commercial appropriation of their names or likenesses was a suit for invasion of privacy. Privacy law, however, proved to be an inadequate response to the legal questions presented by celebrities seeking to protect their economic interest in fame. Whereas privacy law protects a person’s right to be left alone, publicity law proceeds from adverse assumptions. Celebrities do not object to public attention—they thrive on it. However, they seek to benefit from any commercial use of their popularity.
  A celebrity’s public image has many aspects, each of which may be appropriated for a variety of purposes. Plaintiffs(persons bringing a suit) have sought to protect various attributes including: name, likeness, a particular routine or act, characters made famous by their celebrity, unique style, and biographical information. In deciding whether the right of publicity applies to particular attribute, courts consider underlying legal and policy goals. 
  Two goals support recognition of the right of publicity: the promotion of creative endeavor and prevention of unjust enrichment through the theft of goodwill. Courts determine the scope of publicity rights by balancing these policies against offsetting First Amendment and free trade interests. Recognizing the celebrity’s ability to control the exercise of some personal attribute may limit the “speech” of would-be appropriators and give the celebrity a commercial monopoly. Thus, the value of promoting creativity and preventing unjust enrichment must outweigh negative constitutional and commercial repercussions(effects) before courts extend the right of publicity to any particular attribute.
  The value of a publicity right in a particular attribute depends largely on the length of time such a right is recognized and protected by the law. Courts disagree on whether publicity rights survive the death of their creators. Some courts advocate unconditional devisability. They emphasize that the ability to control exploitation of fame is a property right, carrying all the characteristics of the title. Other courts conclude that the right of publicity terminates at the celebritys death. These courts fear that recognizing postmortem(after-death) publicity rights would negatively affect free speech and free trade.

     [收藏] [推荐] [评论] [打印] [关闭]
最新评论共有 0 位网友发表了评论
发表评论
评论内容:不能超过250字,需审核,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
用户名: 密码:
匿名?
注册